The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.
No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites offering both free casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to mention claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue in 2015 alone. Now the business faces allegations of prohibited gaming in a New York claim that declares VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)
'I'm not exactly sure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.
Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online
Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - games are complimentary
Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social media
Find out more
Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
Instead, ads usually focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual sports betting losses.
Others tempt clients with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement showing off Drake's cars, planes and estates before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.
'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.
Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever quit.'
The discrepancy between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.
A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.
'Most social sweeps clients never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting sites.'
Social casinos provide consumers a possibility to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, however can be used to open various functions within the games.
But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to obtain other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.
And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event
Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's cars, planes and estates
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
Traditional online casinos are banned in all but seven states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need generally need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.
Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to submit mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully specific directions. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thus offering them a reason to attempt their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for a chance to win - or lose - real cash.
So why are sweepstakes sites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7?
According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a way of promoting their support.
'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important distinction between social sweeps and conventional online sports betting sites like casinos.'
Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that provide them the chance to win rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million prize.
And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not fulfill the meaning of gambling in the US.
'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all type of everyday companies in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
But to lots of gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.
For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
'They do not last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash free gifts.
'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the attributes frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payout percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the profits made by the company [usually less than one percent]'
Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, using customers the chance to play casino-style video games for real rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over claims of illegal sports betting.
DJ Khaled is among several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos must deal with comparable scrutiny.
'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been cited by courts and state lawyer generals as key consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for prohibited gambling.'
One of the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.
'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are forgoing substantial tax and income chances as this gaming changes that performed through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.
And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.
Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
In the latest claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling enterprise. '
Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.
'We typically don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.
'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and stay confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games across most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just excellent games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of requirements.
'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to strongly defend any claim which may be brought against us.'
The concerns in between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celeb endorsers.
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues want to forecast a strong position against illegal gambling - particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.
It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.
Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting allegedly illegal sports betting sites
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.
'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.
Neither an NBA representative nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.
Asked if their star endorsers have a duty to describe to customers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.
'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'A few of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'
Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.
'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at threat as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful gambling.'
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
